One problem that comes to light frequently is that of hair either on the shaft of the penis or interfering with the restoration process through the pubic hair becoming uncomfortable.
Some people both male and female like to remove some or all of the pubic hair because they like the look or find it more pleasurable during sex. Certainly the reduced sensitivity or 'sensualtivity' caused by circumcision can be enhanced if the pubic hair is removed on one or both partners. This is because extra sexual arousal can be gained in most cases by feeling the warmth of the female flesh in contact with the male pubic skin. The warm moisture from the female can also be felt at the base of the penis if it is devoid of hair as it no longer forms a barrier to either sensation or moisture. This can offset or to some extent compensate towards the great loss of pleasure caused by MGM. It may also help prevent and certainly make the treatment of 'thrush', a common vaginal irritation by reducing vaginal abrasion and removing hair that can help harbour the troublesome fungus.
Some may dispute this as they feel that the hair itself forms stimulation. By trying a non-permanent removal of the hair will at least prove to the individuals concerned what alternative they prefer, the key being that of an 'alternative'.
Another advantage of removing pubic hair is that it can cause soreness in particular with the female if the hair is dragged into her sensitive parts. Similarly any hair on the shaft of the penis will abrade the sensitive tissue of the female as the hair tends to face forward and act as set of fine 'barbs'.
Hair removal is not a new desire or at all odd, the ancient Romans hated any form of body hair and went to great lengths to remove all of it from everywhere except the head.
Circumcision amputates the inner foreskin that does not contain any hair at all, it also amputates the outer foreskin that is almost deficient of hair except the most widely spaced and finest found on the body. The lower pubic shaft skin and sometimes the pubic skin and scrotal sack are drawn forward by an erection, so presenting a very coarse set of hairy skin to the sexual partner (another good reason to ban the practice of MGM).
There are many firms and individuals making large sums of money with bogus claims and devices to remove body hair, at the very least most are devised to remove money from your pocket and have no other use. Because of this the following link has been provided for your protection. I think you will find it very informative and if you feel that you would like to donate to the lady's efforts to save you money then there is a facility to do so from $1 upwards. Please note there is no connection between this site and the owner of the following, I will however praise her efforts as brilliantly public spirited and a very informative site:
Šelks2003 Page last updated 4th October 2003